Hadoop vs QlikView

Hadoop has been making waves in the Big Data Analytics scene, and for good reason. Users rave about its ability to scale like a champ, handling massive datasets that would make other platforms sweat. Its flexibility is another major plus, allowing it to adapt to different data formats and processing needs without breaking a sweat. And let's not forget about reliability – Hadoop is built to keep on chugging even when things get rough. However, it's not all sunshine and rainbows. Some users find Hadoop's complexity a bit daunting, especially if they're new to the Big Data game. The learning curve can be steep, so be prepared to invest some time and effort to get the most out of it. So, who's the ideal candidate for Hadoop? Companies dealing with mountains of data, that's who. If you're in industries like finance, healthcare, or retail, where data is king, Hadoop can be your secret weapon. It's perfect for tasks like analyzing customer behavior, detecting fraud, or predicting market trends. Just remember, Hadoop is a powerful tool, but it's not a magic wand. You'll need a skilled team to set it up and manage it effectively. But if you're willing to put in the work, Hadoop can help you unlock the true potential of your data.

QlikView is one of the foremost BI solutions in the market today, mainly due to the power of its associative query engine to link data from multiple sources that drives its visually impressive dashboards. With its strong data visualization capabilities, users can perform search and filter through data on-the-fly and conduct deep-dives to glean insights that matter to them. With a fast setup, users can have their first data model up and running in very little time. The software resides in-memory and houses data in RAM for quicker retrieval. With multi-tier access permissions for in-organization users, it enables users to view executive summaries at a glance, while allowing them to drill-down into data to find out more. Sadly, Qlik is now scaling back on improvements and updates for QlikView and focusing on promoting QlikSense instead, a possible reason why its filter and search functions, ad-hoc reporting and graphics are lagging in terms of quality, as mentioned in many user reviews. Also, this platform can prove to be resource-heavy for databases housed on local machines, especially when performing batch update jobs. In addition to inflexible pricing plans and the cost of licensing, quite a few necessary add-ons are paid. In summary, QlikView is one of the leading in-memory BI tools available in the market today and rates excellently with users in terms of data aggregation and visualization capabilities; however, buyers should factor in its pricing plans and other limitations when searching for the perfect BI solution for their enterprise.