Our analysts compared Willis Towers Watson vs COMPview based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Compensation Management Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all Compensation Management Software
Willis Towers Watson has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 87% when considering 20 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
COMPview has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 91% when considering 88 user reviews from 2 recognized software review sites.
SelectHub research analysts have evaluated COMPview and concluded it deserves the award for the Best Overall Compensation Management Software available today and earns best-in-class honors for Budgeting and Forecasting and Compliances. COMPview stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
Willis Tower Watson is a finance and risk management solution. Users with positive experiences especially enjoyed the anonymous survey to give feedback to managers — they said it helped drive real change within their organizations. Others like its reporting tools and felt the functionality was easy to adopt and navigate. Retirement funds were a point of contention. Nearly every user who talked about trying to access their pension fund said it was difficult and took longer than expected, ran into issues trying to figure out how to do so or recorded other problems. These negative reviews came mainly from the site TrustRadius. Reviewers posted some comments during an apparent post-COVID backlog. However, many others came from 2019 or earlier. Users were also displeased with the customer service. They complained about a lack of updates, murky communication and misquotes. Even the positive reviews for the customer service said representatives were helpful, but clearly very overworked. Willis Tower Watson may be a good choice for small to medium businesses looking for help with finances and risk management; however, tread carefully around its retirement services.
COMPview has garnered positive feedback for its user-friendly interface and comprehensive compensation management features. Users appreciate the platform's intuitive design, which makes it easy to navigate and find the information they need. The software's ability to handle complex compensation structures, including base pay, bonuses, and equity, has also been praised. Additionally, users value the reporting and analytics capabilities, which provide insights into compensation trends and help ensure pay equity. However, some users have noted that COMPview can be slow at times, particularly when dealing with large datasets. Additionally, the software's customization options have been described as somewhat limited, which may be a concern for organizations with unique compensation needs. Compared to competitors like PayScale and Salary.com, COMPview offers a more robust set of features for managing employee compensation, but it may come at a higher cost. Overall, COMPview is well-suited for mid-sized to large organizations that require a comprehensive solution for managing employee compensation. Its user-friendly interface, robust features, and reporting capabilities make it a valuable tool for HR professionals and compensation analysts. However, organizations with limited budgets or highly specialized compensation needs may want to consider alternative solutions.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...