Our analysts compared Maximo vs SAP EAM based on data from our 400+ point analysis of EAM Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all EAM Software
Maximo has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 87% when considering 978 user reviews from 5 recognized software review sites.
SAP EAM has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 84% when considering 364 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
SelectHub research analysts have evaluated Maximo and concluded it deserves the award for the Best Overall EAM Software available today and earns best-in-class honors for Analytics and Reporting, Asset Tracking, Maintenance and Inspection Management and Mobile EAM.
SelectHub research analysts have evaluated SAP EAM and concluded it earns best-in-class honors for Analytics and Reporting, Asset Management, Environment, Health and Safety Management, Spare Parts Handling and Integration and Extensibility.
IBM Maximo Asset Management helps users perform preventive repairs to extend asset lifespans, monitor assets and equipment, manage contracts, and control inventory. It excels in asset management, tracking and reports. With an intuitive design, plenty of integrations and a high degree of customization, it provides flexibility and ease so users can get the most out of it. However, the UI can be difficult for new users and the cost for licensing is on the higher end. Reviews also cited difficulty with attachments and a complex implementation process as drawbacks. Overall, it’s a good fit for businesses looking for a CMMS with plenty of features that go far beyond asset management.
SAP EAM has garnered a mixed bag of user reviews over the past year. Many users appreciate its comprehensive functionality, particularly for managing complex assets and maintenance processes in industries like oil and gas, utilities, and manufacturing. The software's ability to integrate with other SAP modules, such as finance and HR, is also seen as a major advantage, providing a holistic view of operations. However, some users find the interface clunky and outdated, leading to a steep learning curve for new users. The system's complexity can also make it challenging to configure and customize, often requiring specialized IT support. Compared to competitors like IBM Maximo and Infor EAM, SAP EAM stands out with its robust analytics and reporting capabilities, enabling data-driven decision-making for maintenance strategies. Its mobile functionality also receives praise, allowing technicians to access work orders and asset information on the go. However, SAP EAM can be more expensive than some alternatives, especially for smaller organizations with simpler asset management needs. Additionally, users sometimes mention slower performance compared to cloud-based competitors. Overall, SAP EAM appears best suited for large enterprises with complex asset management requirements and existing SAP infrastructure. Its comprehensive functionality, integration capabilities, and advanced analytics make it a powerful tool for optimizing maintenance operations and extending asset lifecycles. However, organizations seeking a more user-friendly and affordable solution may want to explore other options in the market.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...