Our analysts compared Harris CareTracker vs Tebra EHR based on data from our 400+ point analysis of EHR Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all EHR Software
Harris CareTracker has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 75% when considering 17 user reviews from 2 recognized software review sites.
Tebra EHR has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 82% when considering 407 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
SelectHub research analysts have evaluated Tebra EHR and concluded it earns best-in-class honors for Clinical Documentation, Dashboards and Reporting and Medical Billing.
Many users find it easy to use and navigate, but some have expressed concerns about its performance and support. Harris CareTracker is a popular choice for healthcare providers who are looking for an affordable and user-friendly EHR and practice management solution. Users praise its intuitive interface, which allows them to quickly learn the system and start using it. They also appreciate the wide range of features, including recall management, financing tools, and the ability to access patient information from anywhere. However, some users have reported issues with the software's performance, such as glitches and limitations when working from home. They also find the support to be slow and challenging to deal with. Harris CareTracker is best suited for healthcare providers who are looking for a comprehensive and affordable solution that is easy to use. It is particularly well-suited for small to medium-sized practices that do not have a large IT staff. However, providers who require a highly customizable system or who have a large number of users may want to consider other options.
With a user interface that’s easy to learn, navigate and get used to, Tebra EHR provides efficiency for clinical facilities. Its cost-effectiveness also sets it apart, according to user feedback. However, it doesn’t support all third-party integrations. Additionally, out-of-date tools and features tend to slow down users. Feedback is balanced regarding billing features and customer support, with some users considering them positives while others view them negatively. Overall, the product can be a good choice for independent medical practitioners.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...