Zuman vs WebHR

Last year, users gave Zuman mixed reviews. Many users found its interface intuitive and easy to use, especially for managing payroll and benefits. Some users praised its robust reporting features, which allowed them to quickly generate reports on employee performance and compensation. However, some users reported experiencing glitches and errors, particularly with the software's time-tracking functionality. Others felt that Zuman's customer support was slow and unresponsive. Compared to competitors like BambooHR and Gusto, Zuman is generally considered to be more affordable, but it may lack some of the advanced features offered by these platforms. For example, BambooHR offers more comprehensive onboarding tools, while Gusto provides more integrations with third-party apps. Ultimately, Zuman is best suited for small to medium-sized businesses that need a straightforward and cost-effective solution for managing core HR functions. Larger businesses or those with more complex HR needs may find Zuman's functionality limiting.

WebHR is a payroll and HR services software. Overall, users were happy with its features and functionality and felt happy with the service. They said it was easy to learn and adapt to the workplace, though the design was dated at times. Its payroll, time and attendance, HR management and recruiting tools were especially well-reviewed. Some smaller businesses used it in lieu of hiring an outside service to manage their business. Users had issues with the integrations, in particular, finding it difficult to integrate with other programs. They also ran into issues with its mobile functionality, which they said had a less intuitive design. Occasionally, they also found bugs. Overall, it’s appropriate for businesses that want to outsource their HR services or make use of extra tools to evaluate, compensate and pay their employees.