eClinicalWorks vs Solutionreach

The core functionality of eClinicalWorks is suitable for most medical practices and comes at a fair price. However, many users felt that they were oversold on the product by the sales team. Many users complained of difficulty using the features they needed, and felt that the system interface made it difficult to navigate. Users reported issues with system bugs and were unable to receive sufficient support from the support team to rectify the issues they experienced, despite access to 24/7 support. Some users noted that customer support is outsourced and complained that a language barrier made it difficult to communicate. Ultimately, eClinicalWorks is best suited for small practices with basic EHR needs, though it may take users a few days to learn the system.

Solutionreach user reviews paint a mixed picture. Many users praise its ease of use and effectiveness in boosting patient engagement: "It's made communication with patients much more streamlined—texting is huge for us!" However, some find the features inflexible and customization options limited, comparing it to competitors like Phreesia, which "feels more feature-rich and customizable." Technical glitches and integrations with other healthcare systems are recurring pain points. Some users report occasional system crashes and frustration with incompatible EHRs, noting, "Our scheduling software doesn't always sync smoothly with Solutionreach, which creates extra work." On the other hand, positive reviews highlight Solutionreach's automated workflows and patient feedback tools: "The automated appointment reminders have definitely reduced no-shows, and the surveys help us identify areas for improvement." Cost is a significant factor for some users, with larger practices finding it expensive compared to other options. Pricing transparency and clear breakdowns of additional fees are mentioned as areas for improvement. Overall, Solutionreach seems effective for practices prioritising communication and workflow automation, but potential users should weigh its strengths and weaknesses against competitors, considering their specific needs and technical environment.