Our analysts compared RXNT vs Luma Health based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Patient Scheduling Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all Patient Scheduling Software
RXNT has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 88% when considering 135 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
Luma Health has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 94% when considering 102 user reviews from 2 recognized software review sites.
Luma Health stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
RXNT is an integrated medical software solution offering Electronic Health Records (EHR) with e-prescription and patient engagement support. The cloud-based platform allows users to use and manage the application from anywhere at any time. It offers a user-friendly interface for easy use, management and customization. Reviewers pointed out that sometimes the system would duplicate the patient's information, making the patient have two profiles that lead to confusion and inconvenience. There are instances where the server lags during peak hours and tends to be slow and glitchy. Overall, they provide responsive and helpful support staff who follow up to ensure that problems are fixed before closing the ticket.
Luma Health paints a mixed picture in user reviews. Praised for its streamlined communication, empowered patients, and workflow efficiency, it faces criticism for limited customization, occasional glitches, and higher price tags. "Luma transformed our patient engagement," one user raves. "Appointment reminders cut no-shows in half, and patients love the secure messaging and online bill pay." Others echo this sentiment, highlighting Luma's "intuitive interface" and "patient-centric approach" compared to "clunky alternatives." However, some users find Luma less flexible. "Customization options are limited," one reviewer complains. "I wish I could personalize certain features to better fit our practice's workflow." Others mention occasional technical hiccups, calling them "frustrating workflow disruptions." Cost also emerges as a concern. "Compared to other patient engagement platforms, Luma can be expensive, especially for smaller practices," one user notes. This price point, coupled with the onboarding effort required to get patients actively using the platform, can be a hurdle for some. Overall, Luma Health shines in its ease of use and patient-centric features, but its customization limitations, technical glitches, and higher price tag might deter some users. Ultimately, the decision seems to hinge on individual practice needs and budget constraints. As one user aptly summarizes, "Luma is a powerful tool, but it's not a one-size-fits-all solution."
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...